Yes, this is a book. I included a picture. And a link to read it from Google books.
But before all of the "Ewww, Twilight!!" commences, I would just like to say, "Stop; grow up; I don't want to hear it." Critique the series all you want; it is very angsty and dramatic, I know.
However, this book is not so much about the series as it is a philosophical look at the way vampires are portrayed in Stephanie Meyer's books, the roles religion and feminism play, and what it means to really be compassionate.
So far, at least. I haven't finished the book yet.
The way it's laid out, though, each part focuses on one book of the series and the philosophical issues that arise. For example, part one focuses on Twilight.
The issues discussed are:
- You Look Good Enough to Eat: Love, Madness, and the Food Analogy. This discusses the role food plays in pleasurable emotion, and how that relates to the fact that Edward, in essence, wants to express his desires by literally consuming Bella.
- Dying to Eat: The Vegetarian Ethics of Twilight: Is it ethical for a vampire to spare humans but still eat and kill animals? What makes it different? What are the different standards for humans and vampires regarding diet, and does it make one better than the other?
- Can a Vampire Be a Person?: Pretty self-explanatory; there is a differentiation between being human and a person, so it examines which, if any, a Twilight vampire is capable of being.
- Carlisle: More Compassionate Than a Speeding Bullet?: If you've read any the books or seen any of the movies, then you're aware that Carlisle is the one who promotes the "vegetarian" way of life among vampires, and is very caring towards those close to him. So this section looks at different definitions of compassion, and what it is that makes Carlisle's compassion a heightened capability.
All of these are written by different contributors, and they all draw comparisons to legitimate philosophers (Aristotle, Nietzsche, etc.) and philosophical concepts -- they have very informative footnotes -- so it is something worth reading if the reader wants to see how old thoughts are still relevant to pop culture today.
For those who are not interested in Twilight, there are others in the series that may be of interest:
As well as ones for Watchmen, Batman, The Office, and more.
I'm not a Twilight fan, so I probably wouldn't read this particular one....(vampires don't glitter ;)....just kidding, geeze ha ha. But I would seriously look into the X-men one, Batman and Watchmen....
ReplyDeleteLook at me: I make fun of Twilight, but I'm a huge geek...I believe that is the definition of paradox ha ha
I really want to read the X-Men one. Mostly because when I watched the movies, I was actually able to tell moments when it could be representing something actually existing today. And I like being able to make connections. XD
ReplyDeleteHa, I believe your paradoxical existence is quite acceptable. :) Actually, the book covers something, although kinda vaguely, about how the fact that they only sparkle helps the reader see Edward as a more suitable partner for Bella, sooo maybe it's not all ridiculous. =P